"What is Pearl Harbor?" If you thought "a famous harbor on the Hawaiian island of Oahu," then you probably have what it takes to write answers for Jeopardy. If you were reminded of the opening to Farewell to Manzanar, then you probably need to get out of the house more.
Before I begin, let me give you a quick update. Not too long ago, I rather arbitrarily joined a Xanga reading club that somebody I didn't know was leading. It was spur-of-the-moment decision, so hopefully it will not come back to haunt me. The first book we were ordered to read under pain of excommunication was Farewell to Manzanar by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and Co., which is a book I could only remember the name to because it was sitting on my desk. Literally, I got to the library to pick it up with a complete blank in my mind for what the title was. I had to hop onto a computer just to look it up again. Anyway, it is requested that each member write a book review on their blog about what they thought about the book, so here we are. Let us begin.
Farewell to Isengard is a nonfictional account of a family of Japanese living in the US who had the poor fortune of being Japanese when Pearl Harbor got bombed. Yes, this tale revolves around the family being sent to one of those adorable interment camps that the government hastily set up to ensure those lazy Jappers didn't try any more funny business. The storyteller is the book's author, Jeanne, who is an American-born Japaner (nisei, if you will). The book jumps around the history of the family telling of how their interment affected their lives. Granted, this is a very vague description, but it's such a short book that you can read it yourself if you wanted more.
That's one of my primary gripes with Farewell to Kashyyyk. It is such a short and easy book. I finished it in about six hours and I didn't feel particularly challenged by it, if you know what I mean. Looking back, I suppose I should be grateful for this. I'm far too misanthropic to enjoy a book of this type, which I dub a "pity me" book. She goes on frequently about how racist America was at the time and how difficult life was in the early days of interment and on the way out. It makes me want to yell one of my favorite mantras: "Get off your cross, build a bridge with the wood, and get over it." Why not consider the good it did? We never had another Japanese attack after Executive Order 9066 (hey, if that reasoning can work for Bush...).
I suppose the display of these injustices is the purpose of the book. We look back and think, "how terrible." I prefer to look forward and consider how people sixty years from now will think of us. All of the hated groups of today: queers, heathens, wetbacks, ragheads, Cleveland Browns, &c. We'll all look back and shake our heads in shame as we resume our offworld spice harvesting for the merged Microsoft-Google conglomerate.
One thing I did enjoy from Farewell to Arrakis was how it treated religion. It painted a much more realistic view of the topic. The characters were hardly pious; they were just going through the motions. It also shows how religions can tether children by tales of wonder and boogie-men. One of my favorite lines came in chapter 14: "Years later I silently thanked him for forcing me to postpone such decisions [about religion] until I was old enough to think for myself."
On an aside, chapter eighteen was my favorite. It involved one of Jeanne's brothers, who faught in the war, visiting his estranged family remaining in Japan. It was adorable. The father left them years ago, and the family assumed he died. They were so happy to see that the family lives on. It was probably the only moment to make me go "aww~".
So, I suppose I should sum up my feelings about this book. Does it really matter? This book is on so many grade school reading lists that, frankly, I'm amazed I hadn't read it before (my class instead read Island of the Blue Dolphins, a book I now look upon more favorably). It had some good points, but overall it was boring, easy, and short. I hesitate to recommend the book as a historical portrayal of Japanese internment simply because I know how poor my memory is of life between 7 and 12-ish(?), and I'm only in my early twenties. The author was around her forties when she wrote the book. I'm sure there were significant exaggerations and artistic flourishes. Besides, if it's history someone wants, I'd sooner recommend, y'know, an actual history book. If you don't want to read the book, good, and if you do, tough.
Note: not actually racist.
Recent Comments