September 12, 2010

• Traditional Marriage

  I've had enough of this gay marriage debate. I say it's high time we go back to the traditional definition of marriage. No, I don't mean the lame one that gay marriage bashers carry like a banner: marriage = 1 man + 1 woman. I mean the real traditional definition:

  Marriage = 1 man + n women : n = however many the man wants

  That's how it was in the past, and that's how it should be now. The traditional ways are best, always. A woman is just property, after all. Physical beauty alone should also be a perfectly acceptable reason for marriage, unless political expediency is involved. Oh, and no age limits. Seven or eight is a perfect age for a girl to get married.

  If that all seems to risqué, I ask: why should we even care about marriage at all? Didn't the great Paul-Saul-Muad'Dib write an entire chapter about how people should abstain from marriage altogether (1 Corinthians 7)? We should all, as a people, band together and obliterate marriage and allow only marriage to Jesus.

  … Wait… I think I may want to rephrase that.

  

  • 10:31 am
  • 3 Comments