Long-time readers of my blog know that I hold a certain level of contempt for the Harry Potter movie series. That is, a level just slightly higher than that of sitting in a tub full of broken glass. I had no intent of seeing this two-part finale until I began seeing bad reviews spring up all across the Internet for the first installment. This actually piqued my interest. When I saw people declare bad what they fawned over previously, I took that to mean “different”. Nobody likes to see a change in the formula (see New Coke, et al.), except, of course, for people who did not like the original. If these bad reviews suggest a change in the Harry Potter series, I decided it was time to swallow my pride (and my masculinity) and see if it was a change for the better.
As it turns out, it was. Go figure.
Probably my biggest complaint with previous entries in the more-money-than-Allah Harry Potter series is its pacing. They travel at breakneck speeds to ensure that all of the book’s required scenes make an appearance, while giving them too little time to be interesting. Harry Potter 7, by being split in half by some wankers in marketing, has the opportunity to actually let things slow down, and it is better for it. Scenes actually have a chance to build atmosphere. Characters have a chance to develop. Rupert Grint has more opportunities to get the heck away from the camera (which, fortunately, he does. At least, for a little while).
I would also like to mention the improved use of magic in this one. Rather than just spouting goofy spell names and making things fly around, the wands in Harry Potter 7 are doing what they should always be doing: breaking things. Whenever the cast wasn’t moping around and complaining about how hard life is, they were in fire fights where everything they point at explodes. It’s much more entertaining to watch than just a pair of dudes shooting ribbony light at each other.
I was particularly fond of the scene in the Ministry of Magic that was reminiscent of 1984. They were churning out propaganda left and right, as if preparing Europe for the coming Communist Revolution. I was half-way expecting a lady with orange hotpants to run in and throw a sledgehammer at a giant television screen.
Let me also say that Mrs. Lovett’s character is absolutely bad-ass. She managed to throw a dagger and nail a tiny house-elf in the chest as he was apparating away. The only way it could be more awesome is if the knife was on fire, then exploded (and caused Emma Watson’s clothing to fly off).
I was slightly off-put by the director’s almost religious devotion to having the male characters take off their shirts. Even some of the female characters took opportunities to show some skin (though, not nearly enough to satisfy the few men and lesbians in the audience). If I wanted to see that sort of thing, I would’ve just stayed home and watched 300 again.
Also, did the cameramen forget how a tripod worked? The camera just would not hold still. It wobbled as if the guy holding it was about to puke (probably from the dialogue). I felt like I was watching some crappy French nouvelle vague movie (Jean-Luc Godard, eat your heart out).
Let me wrap things up. This is probably the only Harry Potter movie I would dub “good”. If you’re a fan of the books, it wouldn’t hurt to see it. If you’re not, well, then I suppose you can just go out and not see it. Whatever.
Recent Comments